| 02:41 | <rbuckton> | Thanks for the reminder rbuckton - those repos are now transferred. |
| 16:38 | <Jory Burson> | Hi delegates; sharing a moderation action for transparency: the CoC committee has blocked a GH user from our organization for posting spam to the proposals repo. As always please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you! |
| 17:57 | <bakkot> | as always I am grateful to the CoC committee and the chairs for their good work and efforts both in wrangling community at its worst and in helping us all to work together effectively |
| 20:25 | <rbuckton> | Is there a reason why the RegExp pattern semantics are written in a way that is far different from the rest of the spec? It uses terms like "ordered pair" as opposed to using Records, and "captures m" instead of using internal slots. |
| 20:55 | <bakkot> | rbuckton: I think it was probably just written by someone else |
| 20:56 | <bakkot> | we're actively working on fixing those |
| 20:56 | <bakkot> | e.g. recently landed https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2531 |
| 20:57 | <bakkot> | and https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/1742#issuecomment-675745153 tracking the "ordered pair" thing |
| 20:58 | <bakkot> | and https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/1884 for the "captures m" thing |