18:22
<shu>
jschoi: agreed, i haven't had time to run any calls at all between last meeting and this one
18:57
<waldemar>
i count 4 for advancement, but indeed there'll be a lot of time that could be filled with updates and discussions
Ah, enum for stage 1 was in the "open-ended discussion category" instead of in the proposals.
19:03
<Justin Ridgewell>
I thought TC39 was this week…
19:03
<Justin Ridgewell>
Anyways, TCQ's SSL cert is expired.
19:03
<Justin Ridgewell>
We should fix that before plenary.
19:03
<Justin Ridgewell>
bterlson: ^
20:52
<Rob Palmer>
Bterlson is on it.
22:31
<waldemar>
What is the "presentation from KAIST research group"? I'd like an idea of what we're planning on discussing for this item. It's hard to prepare or look at background materials without any idea what the topic is.
22:45
<Mathieu Hofman>

Here is a link to their publications: https://plrg.kaist.ac.kr/research/publications

Michael Ficarra might want to ask them if there is anything that might be relevant to look at before their presentation.

Also I believe they have an "as late as possible in the day" scheduling constraint. The 2-3 PM slot probably makes sense for them?

23:01
<bakkot>
waldemar: the most relevant papers are https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3324884.3416632 and https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9402086