00:04 | <Michael Ficarra> | or.... we just choose a different name |
00:05 | <Michael Ficarra> | and eventually stop trying to put new things on Array.prototype |
00:05 | <Michael Ficarra> | hopefully one day we can have built-in modules or something and then build out a nice stdlib |
00:05 | <shu> | yeah i do not think we should introduce a new MOP protocol for this |
00:06 | <Kris Kowal> | Symbol.facetious |
00:06 | <bakkot> | quite right, we should use the existing document.all protocol |
00:06 | <Michael Ficarra> | I was waiting for someone to bring up IsHTMLDDA |
00:27 | <Justin Ridgewell> | We pre-scan the source text to see if the word “group” appears anywhere, and if so, we do not install the method. Group is only accessible through computed property access were the key is not literally the string “group”. |
02:16 | <Jack Works> | who knows what keys they're using |
02:18 | <Jack Works> | We pre-scan the source text to see if the word “group” appears anywhere, and if so, we do not install the method. Group is only accessible through computed property access were the key is not literally the string “group”. array["gro" + "up"]() right |
02:30 | <shu> | maybe the engine need to record names that added to the array happens in Web |
02:30 | <shu> | also privacy and fingerprinting concerns? |
08:58 | <Jack Works> | that sounds way too expensive to be feasible |
16:07 | <shu> | those are known counters, they aren't tracking new strings |
20:32 | <shu> | yulia: is Nightly shipping change-array-by-copy? |
20:33 | <shu> | toSorted , toSpliced , and toReversed seem unlikely to be used as keys |
20:33 | <shu> | but i am not so sure about with |
20:56 | <bakkot> | with seems a lot less likely than group |
21:00 | <yulia> | yulia: is Nightly shipping change-array-by-copy? |
21:32 | <shu> | okay, thanks |
21:32 | <shu> | i tried looking for the ibm issue and the other issue on the chromium issue tracker and didn't see anything |
21:34 | <shu> | canary population is pretty small, but i wonder if there're biases in play with people not filing issues, which would be unfortunate |
21:34 | <shu> |
|