| 08:50 | <Rob Palmer> | This week's plenary meeting will be very busy. It is also on CEST (Madrid time) which is super early for US timezone folk. We have more content than time available. Please consider if you think any agenda items you own could use less time, or could be deprioritized, and then PR the agenda accordingly. |
| 14:24 | <Alex Vincent> | FWIW, I have thought about it. (I'm still basically a newbie here.) I had requested 30 minutes: 10 for my talk and 20 for discussion, as I hope for advancing my Mass Proxy Revocation proposal to stage 1. I don't have a feel for how these votes go. Even if I gave up half the discussion time, that really wouldn't buy very much. |
| 21:23 | <bakkot> | Kris Kowal: 20 minutes for the Module Harmony discussion seems wildly optimistic |
| 21:23 | <bakkot> | looking forward to it though |
| 21:40 | <Rob Palmer> | Hey all, we have an unusually large number of personal scheduling constraints for this meeting. This is making it hard to create a viable schedule. The chairs will be reaching out to those affected. If you are able to relax your constraints, please do so. It also helps if you can clarify where something is a *weak*preference vs a hard constraint by PRing the agenda. |
| 22:45 | <Andrew Brown> | Just to confirm since it's my first time attending: this channel will have a Jitsi URL posted somewhere once the meeting starts tomorrow? |
| 22:46 | <ryzokuken> | Andrew Brown: there's a sign-up form for the call link |
| 22:46 | <Andrew Brown> | Can you point me to it? |
| 22:50 | <ryzokuken> | you're right, there is indeed no link yet in the reflector |
| 22:50 | <ryzokuken> | we will send a link to the sign-up form before the meeting |
| 23:03 | <ryzokuken> | draft schedule is up! link in the reflector. |