| 05:56 | <snek> | i just realized that overlaps with GDC |
| 05:56 | <snek> | :( |
| 08:54 | <Rob Palmer> | If you check the Reflector (I don't want to link here), we have a spreadsheet for collecting plenary scheduling constraints. Clashes to avoid etc. You are welcome to add GDC to that so that we try to avoid it for future years. |
| 21:21 | <ljharb> | ryzokuken: i see in the draft schedule that ron's using update is on day 2; i'd love to have my topic on SuppressedError be directly before or after that if possible (currently on day 3), since they're about the same proposal |
| 21:38 | <ryzokuken> | ryzokuken: i see in the draft schedule that ron's |
| 21:46 | <rbuckton> | bakkot: Do you know if esmeta supports multiple constraints preceding a RHS? In the using await proposal I have a [+Using, +Await] using ... production, which both grammarkdown and ecmarkup support, but when I run esmeta it stops immediately with [ESMeta v0.1.0] [Parser (List[spec.Production])] [14.110] failure: end of input expected |
| 22:02 | <rbuckton> | I've filed https://github.com/es-meta/esmeta/issues/133 for the issue. |
| 23:11 | <bakkot> | Yeah, I believe they did basically a clean-room reimplementation of the parsing, so I would not be surprised if it doesn't. I don't know offhand but the devs are pretty responsive. |