| 03:00 | <Jack Works> | ah |
| 03:01 | <Jack Works> | when can we have field declaration in constructor parameter |
| 03:01 | <Jack Works> | rather than |
| 04:02 | <ljharb> | what about if you want this.srv = srv;? |
| 05:08 | <Jack Works> | I don't know 🤣 |
| 09:29 | <Ashley Claymore> | https://es.discourse.group/t/class-property-parameters/543/12 (Note: this was before I had joined Bloomberg, not a BB proposal) |
| 14:13 | <bakkot> | some discussion around take being confusing in this thread, with a proposed fix of renaming to limit; thoughts? https://github.com/tc39/proposal-iterator-helpers/issues/71#issuecomment-1461841551 |
| 14:13 | <bakkot> | specifically the confusion is, the subiterator form take closes the underlying thing when the subiterator is exhausted, which might confuse people who are wanting to repeatedly take a few items |
| 14:14 | <bakkot> | this is a disanalogy with other languages because most things you can call take on don't have a notion of "being closed", even iterators |
| 14:14 | <bakkot> | cc Michael Ficarra |