| 04:11 | <Mathieu Hofman> | I certainly hope the number of ticks is not something programs are not sensitive to since we have the faster promise adoption proposal that would likely change that. |
| 06:58 | <justingrant> | Are there normally spambots commenting in the tc39/proposals repo? I just posted an issue there and got two Chinese-language responses within 4 minutes. General question: what's the normal process for dealing with spam comments in TC39 repos? |
| 07:21 | <littledan> | What I have assumed in the past is that everyone with the appropriate permissions can simply delete spam comments without needing special permission (unlike bad behavior, best referred to the code of conduct committee). If they are persistent, you can escalate to the CoC committee or any chair to get a ban out in place. |
| 15:12 | <ljharb> | let’s not delete things since that leaves no record; certainly hide them as spam tho |
| 22:19 | <jschoi> | I’m a delegate of Indiana University but I’ll be leaving in June. I’m co-champion on several proposals, and I’m interested in continuing to participate in TC39 afterwards – e.g., as an invited expert. What should I do to start that process? |
| 22:30 | <ljharb> | jschoi: the https://github.com/tc39/Admin-and-Business/blob/main/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/delegate-to-invited-expert.md issue template points to https://www.ecma-international.org/invited-expert-form/ for you to fill out - so i think if you fill that out and file an issue that'd kickstart the process? |
| 22:32 | <Michael Ficarra> | jschoi: I've been trying to reach you regarding Array.fromAsync |
| 22:32 | <Michael Ficarra> | I've added a topic to the upcoming plenary's agenda about it |
| 22:32 | <Michael Ficarra> | see https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1mww3D5CO1uebUYiK7l8O5GLjUR98NJYgeHGxQEgnrNA/edit#slide=id.g23957a99532_0_0 |