leading to this lovely bit of spec:

1. NOTE: For historical reasons, the strings "true" and "false" are treated the same as the boolean value true.

Given how long its been since I last presented throw expressions, one of my current stage 2 reviewers is no longer a delegate and is unable to review, while the other has minimal involvement in TC39 at this time. I plan to bring back throw expressions at the next plenary meeting given the discussion at the last meeting, and will ask for new reviewers at that time. If anyone is willing to review the changes that bakkot and I discussed last week, I'd appreciate it. I'd be especially grateful if you would be willing to volunteer as a reviewer at the next plenary as well.

The PR for the relevant changes to the throw expressions proposal can be found here: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-throw-expressions/pull/17

The relevant change since this was last proposed for advancement from Stage 2 to Stage 3 is the addition of a new lookahead restriction at the end of the expression that would disallow any trailing binary operator or ? so that throw expressions would not require parentheses in most places, but would disallow syntax that would have different semantics compared to throw as a statement.

My hope is that I can propose advancement to Stage 3 at the next plenary assuming I can find willing volunteers for reviewers in advance of the meeting.