| 02:14 | <leobalter> | ShadowRealms have different use cases, but the ones I need for my company are all Web related. So I agree we can't and shouldn't detach the HTML integration from it. I also see no advantage of the proposal remaining on Stage 3 if I don't have a fully "ready to implement" status yet. I concur to believe this committee will act as its best to continue moving the proposal forward even if needs to take a step back. I'm personally positive with the change and looking forward to continue the HTML integration process with Igalia! |
| 14:18 | <dminor> | If we're looking for an issue to continue this conversation, I think this one that my colleague Matt opened a few months ago is the place: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-shadowrealm/issues/386 |
| 14:38 | <Chris de Almeida> | we were like minutes away from pressing the kill switch button before the GH thread was updated that the upstream fix was rolled out |
| 14:54 | <shu> | oh this is gonna make it after all? 🎉 |
| 14:55 | <shu> | but! given that the tamper-resistant mode that freezes intrinsics is turned on by default... |
| 14:55 | <shu> | need to be on the lookout for other breakages |
| 14:56 | <Chris de Almeida> | ah.. was hoping they would change their impl |
| 14:57 | <shu> | they turned it off for the one broken site that was reported |
| 14:58 | <shu> | here's to hoping their other customers have a regenerator runtime <2 years old |