| 03:15 | <littledan> | wouldn't ecma's lawyers be the ones that need to approve it? |
| 03:15 | <littledan> | Ecma can also contact their lawyer on retainer for advice but these IPR questions are not handled by only that |
| 17:46 | <bakkot> | where did all of these people come from all of a sudden https://github.com/tc39/proposal-array-grouping/issues/62 |
| 17:46 | <bakkot> | did the proposal get linked somewhere |
| 17:53 | <shu> | " I tried explaining the issue to my small (kindergarten~) son, and to summarize him after explaining it a few times at different levels of complexity: "It feels like a cute little penguin swimming against the flow of other array functions, breaking the chain of function chaining possibilities and hiding its cuteness from discoverability" " |
| 17:53 | <shu> | is this satire |
| 22:18 | <TabAtkins> | I mean they're right that having it be a static function really sucks, but yeah our hands our tied. Just means we need the pipeline operator. |
| 22:36 | <ljharb> | lol seems like LLM drivel |