| 00:54 | <bakkot> | PR for moving/renaming the methods: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-arraybuffer-base64/pull/45 |
| 03:17 | <Michael Ficarra> | bakkot: I hope you're gonna PR iterator helpers proposal and my follow-ons 🙏 |
| 05:29 | <bakkot> | Michael Ficarra: you mean for https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/3268? yes, once the biblio is published |
| 22:12 | <rbuckton> | I may need to split up the Function Decorators proposal into two presentations and may split the proposal itself, after plenary. The current proposal includes functions and object literal elements, but that's a lot to cover and I have a feeling we will spend a long time discussing function declarations. |
| 22:22 | <Rob Palmer> | This is encouragement for you to come to San Diego to get extra time with other delegates to talk about Decorators and tacos. |
| 22:50 | <littledan> | I may need to split up the Function Decorators proposal into two presentations and may split the proposal itself, after plenary. The current proposal includes functions and object literal elements, but that's a lot to cover and I have a feeling we will spend a long time discussing function declarations. |
| 22:50 | <rbuckton> | I know I'm going to at least need to amend my timebox to something longer. |
| 23:20 | <rbuckton> | This is encouragement for you to come to San Diego to get extra time with other delegates to talk about Decorators and tacos. |
| 23:21 | <rbuckton> | I added a note to the Normal Constraints section indicating that the presentation can be split into two separate timeboxes of 60 and 30 minutes to focus on the two high level areas of the proposal, independently. |
| 23:21 | <rbuckton> | I'm leaving it as a single presentation for now, as I still hope to advance them together as a single proposal. |