| 09:21 | <Ashley Claymore> | FYI "iterator unique for stage 1" is on the draft schedule twice, just in case that is an accident |
| 15:29 | <nicolo-ribaudo> | It's too late for this meeting, but we should probably demote decorators from Stage 3 to the new Stage 2.7, since it has almost no tests (there are only a copule of syntax tests, but a huge part of the proposal is about runtime behavior) |
| 15:43 | <Chris de Almeida> | thanks, fixed. not sure how that happened, as the timeboxes for the sessions were accurate. so no additional time freed up ☹️ |