| 00:08 | <rbuckton> | * Maybe we could have done the same for AwaitExpression (i.e., `await` [lookahead != `using` Identifier] UnaryExpression ), but I don't think we want more two-token lookahead in ECMA262. |
| 00:13 | <rbuckton> | The LR(1) goal/requirement predates my involvement at TC39 and has been strongly held by many delegates for well over a decade. I can't speak to their reasoning. |
| 00:21 | <Michael Ficarra> | "many" is a strong word |
| 17:10 | <snek> | do we have a process for changing who you are a delegate for? or is it just offboard and then onboard |
| 17:12 | <snek> | oh nvm i see there's a github issue template, neat |