00:49 | <Mathieu Hofman> | I really hope over time the spec is allowed to change the number of ticks some things take. I believe we did so for async function return already |
04:41 | <rkirsling> | shu: did you mean to leave this needs-consensus topic just titled by its number on the agenda? 🤔 |
04:41 | <rkirsling> | https://github.com/tc39/agendas/commit/870dd57707700201cc6893d4b7bbb1b133a2e51a |
04:48 | <ljharb> | yes, that’s intentional |
05:31 | <rkirsling> | these map.emplace slides are so pretty |
05:31 | <rkirsling> | nice work dminor |
08:13 | <rkirsling> | and shu's presentation is totally gonna be a show-stealer, I'm excited for this 😁 |
20:44 | <Chris de Almeida> | copypasting Rob's message from the reflector: |
20:44 | <Chris de Almeida> | The agenda continues to fill with content and is beyond our capacity. There's roughly 20 hours of agenda content and 16 hours of meeting time to fit it in. So we are over budget by about 4 hours. Sometimes we recover an hour or two, but not four. ActionsMore TimeOur hosts are happy for us to continue until 5pm each day, so I propose we extend Thursday to finish at 5pm instead of finishing at 4pm. Less ContentTo everyone that has placed items on the agenda, please consider voluntary actions to mitigate the capacity problem. For example you could:
|
22:27 | <Michael Ficarra> | alright I added lower bounds to my items' timeboxes, hope that helps with scheduling |