13:59
<littledan>
it'd be great to standardize this web reality around stacks, e.g., in Annex B, but if TC39 doesn't want to do it, we could do it in WHATWG.
14:15
<dminor>
A gentle reminder that proposals up for advancement to Stage 2, 2.7, 3 or 4 must have their supporting materials added prior to the advancement deadline, or delegates can withhold consensus solely on the basis of missing the deadline.
19:24
<ljharb>
in my case there are no supporting materials :-)
20:06
<littledan>
I'd encourage everyone to put all agenda items and supporting materials out there before the advancement deadline, just to help folks prepare, even if not advancing.
23:24
<shu>
ljharb: there were many blocking concerns last time stacks were discussed, including conflicting ones. without supporting materials, i don't know what you're actually proposing for stage advancement that addressed those concerns
23:28
<ljharb>
ljharb: there were many blocking concerns last time stacks were discussed, including conflicting ones. without supporting materials, i don't know what you're actually proposing for stage advancement that addressed those concerns
that isn't my recollection; from what I recall the only blocking concern for stage 2 specifically (as opposed to later stages) was the requirement to specify the entire contents of the text as opposed to just the structure (as it currently is). i'm proposing to revisit that discussion with no changes to the proposal and, if concerns still exist, get them freshly documented.
23:31
<shu>
i'm going off https://github.com/tc39/notes/blob/main/meetings/2019-03/mar-28.md#error-stacks-for-stage-2:~:text=JHD%3A%20To%20restate,need%20to%20make.
23:31
<shu>
is there a more recent meeting i missed? i might've missed that one too actually