| 00:19 | <kriskowal> | reference cycle detected |
| 02:07 | <rkirsling> | the fact is that nothing can go "for" stage 0 though |
| 02:08 | <rkirsling> | I think if the actual concern surrounds the usage of the Stage 0 Proposals page, it would seem better to rename, or maybe even redefine, that page |
| 02:09 | <rkirsling> | in particular, "planned to be presented to the committee by a TC39 champion" doesn't seem like a status that should warrant inclusion on any page other than a meeting agenda |
| 02:10 | <rkirsling> | it would make sense to me if that page were exclusively for proposals that "have been presented to the committee and not rejected definitively, but have not yet achieved |
| 02:11 | <rkirsling> | at which point the page could be renamed to Already-Presented Stage 0 Proposals or whatever |
| 16:49 | <ljharb> | why not? that’s the moment it becomes something delegates should pay attention to, not merely when it’s presented. |