| 00:15 | <ptomato> | I don't mind if people want to polish their text with LLMs so that they can make themselves understandable in English with confidence. I've seen that in real life enabling better participation from people whose English level is prohibitive. ideally any policy we adopt wouldn't exclude that |
| 00:30 | <ljharb> | it's very tricky to allow any legit usage while disallowing all illegit usage tho. quite frankly i'd rather someone post a reply in their native language and i do the translation for myself, than that they post something that appears to be in english but isn't idiomatic and has weird flaws |
| 00:37 | <ptomato> | that would work, as well. we'd have to be quite clear that it's encouraged, though; in many open source spaces non-English contributions are closed just as quickly than obvious LLM work, by well-meaning contributors |
| 22:11 | <nicolo-ribaudo> | Allowing multiple languages severely impacts search |
| 23:15 | <shu> | looking at RegExp.prototype[Symbol.replace] to fix a bug, what is this monstrosity? is this the most complicated builtin we have |