| 04:16 | <rkirsling> | er hmm, wonder if this is an ecmarkup bug |
| 04:16 | <rkirsling> | <emu-alg>1. [id="foo", normative-optional] blah ... |
| 04:17 | <rkirsling> | -- i.e. using a normative optional block as the first step in an algorithm -- |
| 04:17 | <rkirsling> | seems to create the block correctly, but doesn't actually give it a number; accordingly, the next step gets "1." |
| 04:29 | <shu> | i'd file an issue on ecmarkup |
| 04:37 | <rkirsling> | cool |
| 04:41 | <rkirsling> | hmm |
| 04:42 | <rkirsling> | actually maybe the list position doesn't matter; I'm just seeing different behavior on main vs. the PR#2952 (Annex B convention update) output |
| 05:10 | <rkirsling> | found the regression |
| 05:10 | <rkirsling> | created an issue https://github.com/tc39/ecmarkup/issues/640 |
| 08:50 | <rkirsling> | also whatever happened to build previews -- they're just dead across-the-board for the moment? (er like, the action fails across the board. existing previews can still be viewed) |
| 14:25 | <bakkot> | yes |
| 14:42 | <bakkot> | the thing which happened is github broke the thing we were using and the replacement did not immediately fix it https://github.blog/changelog/2024-04-16-deprecation-notice-v3-of-the-artifact-actions/ |
| 14:43 | <bakkot> | simplest solution is probably to just switch to hosting on github pages which is easy but I haven't done it yet and I think it's not ljharb's preferred approach |
| 20:53 | <shu> | is it possible to just... not care about e2e encryption for matrix |
| 20:53 | <shu> | i am tired of not being able to figure out why half the time, none of previous messages can be decrypted |