04:06
<bakkot>
do you think it would be web-compat to make ArrayBuffers indexable, as if they were wrapped in a Uint8Array
04:06
<bakkot>
it is kind of silly that you have to make the wrapper
04:50
<ljharb>
it is silly and that'd be a cool change to be able to make. somehow i doubt it's doable tho - altho an .at method could almost certainly be added?
04:51
<ljharb>
although either way it raises the question "how large is each item", since there's no associated byte size?
15:22
<TabAtkins>
ArrayBuffer is an array of bytes, and the methods that do exist on it (.slice()) index the bytes. Indexing would do the same.
15:56
<ljharb>
ah ok, good point