04:06 | <bakkot> | do you think it would be web-compat to make ArrayBuffers indexable, as if they were wrapped in a Uint8Array |
04:06 | <bakkot> | it is kind of silly that you have to make the wrapper |
04:50 | <ljharb> | it is silly and that'd be a cool change to be able to make. somehow i doubt it's doable tho - altho an .at method could almost certainly be added? |
04:51 | <ljharb> | although either way it raises the question "how large is each item", since there's no associated byte size? |
15:22 | <TabAtkins> | ArrayBuffer is an array of bytes, and the methods that do exist on it (.slice() ) index the bytes. Indexing would do the same. |
15:56 | <ljharb> | ah ok, good point |