| 02:41 | <bakkot> | nicolo-ribaudo: thanks for putting together slides for the export-*-as PR. while we're here, I noticed in https://tc39.es/ecma262/multipage/ecmascript-language-scripts-and-modules.html#sec-resolveexport step 9.e.iii.1 that it says "Assert: There is more than one * import that includes the requested name". That should be "* export", surely, yes? |
| 03:16 | <nicolo-ribaudo> | Yep you are right |
| 03:57 | <arai> | I'm testing on SpiderMonkey. there's some issue with the expectation around how "asyncTest" should interact with "negative". not yet sure if it's on our side or in the test side |
| 03:58 | <arai> | also there are 3 tests that expects behavior before https://github.com/rbuckton/ecma262/pull/14 , for using in switch |
| 04:03 | <bakkot> | ljharb: I am confused by https://github.com/tc39/agendas/commit/61962210dd2547d194eae2bb9cdf8669421a4f98; when did this get stage 2.7 and where are the tests for it? |
| 04:04 | <rbuckton> | Thanks, I'll take a look tomorrow |
| 04:21 | <arai> | added comments to the PRs |
| 04:23 | <ljharb> | Oh you’re right, my bad. I’ll revert that commit. It’s 2 and I’m going for 2.7 |
| 04:24 | <ljharb> | not sure why i got confused there |
| 17:58 | <Ashley Claymore> | If anyone wanted to ask questions about Composites ahead of plenary I'll be dialed into the legacy "R&T Monthly" zoom call on the TC39 events calendar that starts in one hour from now (19:00 UTC) |
| 22:28 | <rbuckton> | Thanks. These should all be addressed now |