| 00:03 | <Chris de Almeida> | 404 from the agenda as well 🤔 |
| 00:04 | <Chris de Almeida> | fixed both |
| 19:19 | <dminor> | rbuckton: Unfortunately, we won't have time to review RegExp Buffer Boundaries stage advancement properly, and will block based upon late addition to the agenda. |
| 19:49 | <rbuckton> | rbuckton: Unfortunately, we won't have time to review RegExp Buffer Boundaries stage advancement properly, and will block based upon late addition to the agenda. |
| 19:59 | <rbuckton> | If it helps, now that we have Modifiers the proposal doesn't add new functionality, only syntactic sugar that is consistent with the interpretation in every other RegExp engine that supports it, which is nearly all of them. |
| 20:18 | <dminor> | It's probably fine, but I want someone with more experience with our regexp implementation than me to have a look, and there's no time for that now. |
| 22:11 | <rbuckton> | I'll still present, and maybe hold out hope that someone over there might have time to take a look before close of plenary. If not, I'll at least be able to offer an update. |
| 22:45 | <Olivier Flückiger> | We didn't discuss it either in V8. |