2021-03-01 2021-03-02 2021-03-03 2021-03-04 [12:49:06.0161] What is the schedule of meeting and breaks on Tuesday and Wednesday> [12:49:10.0651] ? [12:49:27.0248] In a 4-day, 5-hour setup, we do 2 hrs meeting, 1 hr break, 2 hrs meeting. [12:49:32.0372] How does it work with the 2-day setup? [12:49:37.0599] Correct. [12:50:01.0971] My calendar has 7 hours blocked for TC39 on Tuesday/Wednesday [12:50:47.0622] Is that incorrect? Should it be only 5 hours? [12:51:49.0632] The TC39 Events Calendar has an event created by yulia which is 7 hours long [12:52:05.0185] The agenda is correct. The calendar is wrong. [12:52:22.0175] oh, no, I can't read. It's only 5 hours. Maybe yulia fixed it before I copied it from TC39 calendar to my calendar [12:52:27.0069] Sorry! [12:52:47.0430] No problem - this is useful clarification for all of us 😉 [12:55:14.0445] Are we still planning on the editor updates, or should we skip those given the shorter amount of time? [12:55:44.0896] Maybe we don't need the ECMA-402 update presentation again since we just gave it 6 weeks ago. Also for the ECMA update, etc. [12:57:32.0162] 😬 i have no memory [12:58:27.0809] Right. I think it's up to each of the groups if they want to present, but I would definitely err on the side of "only if needed" given we only have a total of 8 hours plenary. [13:01:09.0123] OK. I'll let leobalter and Richard Gibson (not on matrix?) decide if they have anything to ask about editorial issues in ECMA-402 [13:01:22.0101] but I won't plan on the normal update presentation. I'll save that for April [13:02:38.0582] yulia: I think the event you created is correct! I don't know how 7 hours ended up on my calendar. Maybe that was a mistake I made. Sorry for the misatribution! [13:03:04.0990] i think your guess was right, i set up the dates before we came up with the 8 meeting schedule, and originally they were 7 hours [13:03:17.0961] so if you pulled in from there, it was the old entry [13:56:02.0873] BTW I want to volunteer my agenda items as lower priority if there's missing time [13:56:09.0605] * BTW I want to volunteer my agenda items as lower priority if there's missing time [13:56:15.0954] they are not urgent for any particular reason [13:56:41.0344] Thank you, Dan [13:56:45.0716] I like the idea of doing the regular status updates only at the longer meetings [13:57:26.0956] (of course if there is some normative PR that Intl wants to propose, that's fine to include; no reason that that needs to be batched only 4 times a year) [15:24:38.0765] > <@sffc:mozilla.org> oh, no, I can't read. It's only 5 hours. Maybe yulia fixed it before I copied it from TC39 calendar to my calendar sorry I silently fixed it 😅 2021-03-05 2021-03-06 2021-03-07 2021-03-08 2021-03-09 [10:29:22.0048] Are we still using IRC this meeting? My IRCCloud subscription expired and I want to know whether I should renew it, or if we are on Matrix now [10:29:50.0957] We have not formally adopted Matrix yet [10:30:02.0826] though irccloud is free when not using it as a bouncer [10:30:10.0074] sffc: we are still using IRC formally, but you can use the bridge channel. [10:30:25.0278] I recommend against using the bridge channel [10:30:35.0448] it just doesn't work very well [10:30:46.0774] please use either a real IRC client, or Matrix, but don't try to use one for the other 2021-03-10 [15:01:19.0995] thank you for calling that out yulia, I was about to pipe up. I was also taken aback by "lower-end developers" and found it very inappropriate. [15:02:05.0674] yeah its hard to be on the spot, i just wanted to make sure it didn't get out to public [15:02:16.0556] i don't think it is what he meant [15:02:46.0478] we should be careful though, not to say that kind of thing [15:03:08.0105] I gather the intent was "developers who aren't familiar with spec work", or perhaps "developers who don't have functional programming experience" [15:03:30.0979] yeah, just unfamiliarity rather than stratification [15:23:26.0791] I guess Aki was joking when she said bell curve? I mean... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bell_Curve [15:24:32.0035] 🤦🏻‍♀️ > _For the principal, mathematical meaning of the term "bell curve", see Normal distribution_ [15:24:47.0123] > They also argue that those with high intelligence, the "cognitive elite", are becoming separated from those of average and below-average intelligence, and that this separation is a source of social division within the United States. 😬 [15:24:48.0744] TIL 2021-03-11 [03:08:37.0691] * yeah, just unfamiliarity rather than stratification [03:09:15.0593] uff that book... [10:51:41.0359] Yeah that book looks horrendous but “the bell curve” isn’t exactly an obscure mathematical concept [11:00:08.0221] Well, I guess the badness of the book is part of a more general badness of imagining a linear fitness function for people 2021-03-12 2021-03-13 2021-03-14 2021-03-15 2021-03-16 2021-03-17 2021-03-18 2021-03-19 2021-03-20 2021-03-21 2021-03-22 2021-03-23 2021-03-24 2021-03-25 [09:26:09.0154] Aki yulia bterlson Rob Palmer - can you process Mark and Markus's pending TC39 invitations when you have a change? Thanks! https://github.com/tc39/Admin-and-Business/issues/114 https://github.com/tc39/Admin-and-Business/issues/113 [09:29:16.0035] Github invites are now sent. [09:33:39.0609] Thank you! 2021-03-26 2021-03-27 2021-03-28 2021-03-29 2021-03-30 2021-03-31