2025-04-01 [21:20:55.0671] the ES2025 candidate has been prepared: https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/releases/tag/es2025-candidate-2025-03-31 https://github.com/tc39/Reflector/issues/557 [22:35:29.0753] linusg has kindly made a pull request to proposal-array-from-async (https://github.com/tc39/proposal-array-from-async/pull/48). It makes mostly editorial updates to the proposal spec to match ECMA-262 changes. There’s also a small proposal spec bugfix. Way back in 2022, the proposal spec received pre-Stage-3 reviews from ljharb and nicolo-ribaudo. Should I ask them for repeated reviews before merging the pull request, or should I be okay with merging it unilaterally? (I do plan on kickstarting the proposal back up soon, maybe all the way to Stage 4.) [01:01:51.0633] I'm happy to take another look next week 2025-04-03 [19:01:46.0722] Is there a particular reason why withdrawn [proposal-operator-overloading](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-operator-overloading)’s repository hasn’t been archived? littledan withdrew it about a year ago, but various people have still been posting to it. [19:02:11.0578] * Is there a particular reason why withdrawn [proposal-operator-overloading](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-operator-overloading)’s repository hasn’t been archived? littledan withdrew it about a year ago, but various people have still been posting to it since. [19:03:55.0098] (It would also be good to link prominently to https://github.com/tc39/notes/blob/main/meetings/2023-11/november-28.md#withdrawing-operator-overloading from the explainer.) [19:04:30.0305] Ditto goes for [proposal-extended-numeric-literals](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-extended-numeric-literals). [19:04:46.0571] * Ditto goes for [proposal-extended-numeric-literals](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-extended-numeric-literals), though that’s been getting less community traffic.