| 09:13 | <ryzokuken> | https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/729 |
| 09:13 | <ryzokuken> | does this have TG2 consensus? |
| 09:44 | <sffc> | No; we discussed the issue and agreed to move forward with a PR, but the actual PR has not received TG2 consensus |
| 13:49 | <Richard Gibson> | does anyone understand why Frank objected to https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/729 ? It corrects a spec bug to align with external and implementation reality, does so by changing two characters (-0 to 1), and has been up to look at for two weeks. |
| 13:50 | <ryzokuken> | Frank and Dan objected to TG1 consensus before TG2 consensus |
| 13:52 | <Richard Gibson> | I got that from Dan, but the notes have "Nobody have chance to look at the PR" from Frank, which is just incorrect. And the implementation that he contributes to already conforms with the proposed spec text. |
| 13:53 | <ryzokuken> | I took it that he meant that "we didn't look at it because it was not discussed in the monthly meeting" |
| 13:53 | <ryzokuken> | he also mentioned that the slides were not uploaded sooner |
| 13:53 | <ryzokuken> | but then, these are just PRs on the repo |
| 13:53 | <Richard Gibson> | sure |
| 13:54 | <ryzokuken> | so anyone should be able to review them ahead of time |
| 13:54 | <ryzokuken> | anyway, we were low on time so I decided it was best to discuss this offline and come back next meeting |
| 13:56 | <Richard Gibson> | I'm ok with that, I just found the objection surprising and was wondering whether there might have been more context in person |
| 16:10 | <littledan> | The topic was also presented as if you didn’t have much of a conclusion yet at all; it sounds like that was a misunderstanding of mine |