| 00:32 | <ptomato> | hi folks, since we have a short Temporal overflow item tomorrow, we have a chance to ask for consensus on https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2479 again. given that, it'd be much appreciated if you have a chance to weigh in on that PR or its associated issue by about 11:00 Eastern time tomorrow - obviously we won't put it up for consensus again unless everyone has had enough of a chance to review it, but it'd be nice not to have to delay it until the next plenary! thanks |
| 00:45 | <justingrant> | So I guess the options are (1) always use ZDT zone and eat the format-time lookup cost; (2) require the time zones to match; or (3) require the time zones to match but only if the constructor received an explicit zone. |
| 00:48 | <ptomato> | (3), essentially |
| 01:42 | <justingrant> | From the convo above it sounds like (2) is more likely to get consensus, and we could maybe relax to (3) in March? |
| 01:43 | <justingrant> | sffc: how would you suggest we proceed? |
| 01:43 | <justingrant> | (or others) |