| 13:01 | <ryzokuken> | Richard Gibson: time to push the meta commit and cut the spec? |
| 16:24 | <Richard Gibson> | yes, I think so. I wonder if we should also summarize changes in the Introduction like ECMA-262, but that hasn't happened in many years |
| 16:48 | <ryzokuken> | yes, I think so. I wonder if we should also summarize changes in the Introduction like ECMA-262, but that hasn't happened in many years |
| 16:48 | <ryzokuken> | I mean, I don't have a very strong opinion here |
| 16:48 | <ryzokuken> | But maybe since we're already a bit late this year around, why not leave it as is for now and plan ahead for next time? |
| 16:49 | <Richard Gibson> | ok, then I guess the path of least resistance is to leave it for now and revisit next year |
| 16:49 | <Richard Gibson> | 👍️ |
| 16:49 | <ryzokuken> | Perfect |
| 16:50 | <ryzokuken> | Did you already have the commit ready? I suppose we'll have to branch out, push the commit and then produce the PDF. |
| 17:04 | <Richard Gibson> | I can prep it now... should we use today's date? |
| 17:04 | <ryzokuken> | I think so? What are our options? |
| 17:05 | <Richard Gibson> | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
| 17:05 | <ryzokuken> | let's just go with today's |
| 17:42 | <Richard Gibson> | https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/tree/es2023 https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/775 |
| 18:45 | <ryzokuken> | PTAL and let me know how it looks |
| 18:45 | <ryzokuken> | after a while (and hopefully approvals from a few of you) I'll send it out to Istvan |
| 18:58 | <Richard Gibson> | LGTM 👍️ |