| 00:33 | <ljharb> | i thought we decided not to do that |
| 00:35 | <jmdyck> | decided not to break the spec into multiple documents, or decided not to generate a single file? |
| 01:00 | <Michael Ficarra> | @ljharb We did not decide whether they would be separate source files. |
| 01:01 | <jmdyck> | so when's that going to be decided |
| 01:02 | <jmdyck> | because I'll have to change ecmaspeak if it's multiple files |
| 01:08 | <ljharb> | i thought we did - it wasn’t just about the built representation that we discussed, we also talked about the source files. |
| 01:09 | <ljharb> | (I assume a ton of tools will need to adapt if the source files are split - i have a few too) |
| 08:35 | <nicolo-ribaudo> | I had understood that the previous editors group already decided that Temporal would be merged as separate files |
| 14:18 | <Michael Ficarra> | We definitely *wanted* to, but it wasn't a "decision" because we may run into issues like the ones we've all been pointing out |
| 23:02 | <ljharb> | i also continue to maintain that something that big isn't the sole purview of the editor's group |