17:37
<ljharb>
the mutex doesn't seem to be working (for the preview builds)
17:45
<Michael Ficarra>
I wish there was a good way to test it without creating a bunch of noise
17:45
<Michael Ficarra>
I guess we could make a separate repo
17:51
<bakkot>
what is this operation https://tc39.es/ecma262/multipage/executable-code-and-execution-contexts.html#sec-module-environment-records-getbindingvalue-n-s
17:51
<bakkot>
  1. If the binding for name is an indirect binding, then
    a. Let module and targetName be the indirection values provided when this binding for name was created.
17:52
<nicolo-ribaudo>
Yeah, how we do live bindings for imports is... something 😅
17:53
<bakkot>
I guess this is https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2288
17:58
<Michael Ficarra>
yes, I've been trying to get eyes on that PR for forever
17:58
<Michael Ficarra>
looks like we'll finally be getting to it soon
17:59
<Michael Ficarra>
FYI I've moved all issues on the ecma262 "project" below all PRs, since I figure we should always get to high-priority work that has already been done before high-priority work that is yet to be done