2026-09-03
[08:03:58.0551] <ptomato>
I can join in the second half of the call if it makes sense to talk about the proof-carrying ISO Date Records. but maybe you want to let the ideas brew a bit longer or you want me to come back with more of a concrete proposal? let me know, otherwise I'll check in at :30

[08:41:54.0128] <ptomato>
or :45, I guess - meeting is running over

[08:48:55.0581] <ptomato>
sorry, I think I'd better skip today after all

[09:03:35.0083] <Michael Ficarra>
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1x2UCdQjVo-5GEwE77Ww8SD5HYCpfsAp5QuYf4n1yC-0

[09:04:03.0003] <Michael Ficarra>
that's okay, we spent the whole call on Mikhail's topic

[09:04:17.0400] <Michael Ficarra>
@mikbar-uib:matrix.org can you post your slides link?

[09:04:41.0654] <jmdyck>
terminology clarification: when I said "current state of the syntactic parse", that's what https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-ecmascript-language-lexical-grammar refers to as "the syntactic grammar context"

[09:33:48.0021] <Mikhail Barash>
> <@michaelficarra:matrix.org> @mikbar-uib:matrix.org can you post your slides link?

Yes, here is the link to the slides: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1dmYxiQwcpS4_bnVKf1H-n-3yq6D9yRGcMMXCv_rL0mc/edit?usp=sharing


2026-09-08
[14:38:16.0329] <jmdyck>
https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-asyncfromsynciteratorcontinuation's `_unwrap_` abstract closure now has a parameter whose name duplicates/shadows the name of an outer alias. PR https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/3016 removed such cases, and established an editorial convention against them (though it doesn't appear in Editorial-Conventions).


2026-09-10
[08:50:04.0964] <Richard Gibson>
forgot to update here, but I'm out of town today


2026-09-16
[02:19:49.0843] <nicolo-ribaudo>
linus I see that you added https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/3925 to the priorities list, do you know if the champions plan to propose it for stage 4? It's not on the agenda

[02:21:10.0069] <linus>
I assumed it would get added to the agenda just based on the PR being opened

[02:21:41.0543] <linus>
but we can take it off the list for now

[02:33:28.0896] <nicolo-ribaudo>
I'm thinking of creating an "editors approved" label, that we can put on PRs that would be "ready to merge" except that they are missing tests/consensus

[02:33:36.0448] <nicolo-ribaudo>
So that in the project I see what I can avoid clicking on

[02:40:38.0031] <nicolo-ribaudo>
* I'm creating an "editors approved" label that we can put on PRs that would be "ready to merge" except that they are missing tests/consensus

[03:02:16.0142] <nicolo-ribaudo>
So much stuff to review for this plenary 😅

[03:03:02.0267] <nicolo-ribaudo>
* So much stuff to review for this plenary 😅 It's the first 9 items in the priorities project

[03:03:47.0948] <nicolo-ribaudo>
For the Iterator helpers PRs from Michael maybe the approvals by Linus and me are enough

[03:10:42.0324] <linus>
I much prefer that over proposals that get stuck for years :P

[08:20:54.0107] <Michael Ficarra>
> <@nicolo-ribaudo:matrix.org> For the Iterator helpers PRs from Michael maybe the approvals by Linus and me are enough

certainly enough for stage 4, we can discuss whether it's enough for a merge after plenary if we don't get more reviews

[10:19:28.0190] <Michael Ficarra>
ping @gibson042:matrix.org https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/3926#issuecomment-5621166492

[10:41:55.0121] <Richard Gibson>
thanks, I _knew_ I was forgetting something! https://github.com/tc39/agendas/pull/2152


2026-09-17
[07:35:12.0141] <linus>
might run 10 mins or so late today

[07:35:31.0759] <jmdyck>
i won't be at today's mts

[07:35:34.0639] <jmdyck>
meeting

[08:01:35.0234] <nicolo-ribaudo>
Meeting time, for those who celebrate

[08:29:40.0981] <nicolo-ribaudo>
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1x2UCdQjVo-5GEwE77Ww8SD5HYCpfsAp5QuYf4n1yC-0/edit?slide=id.gc6f73a04f_0_0#slide=id.gc6f73a04f_0_0 if anybody has anything to add

[08:30:37.0849] <nicolo-ribaudo>
Actually Richard Gibson probably prioritize the 404 stuff over 262 reviews

[09:22:54.0133] <Michael Ficarra>
@nicolo-ribaudo:matrix.org were you planning on presenting the slides at plenary

[09:22:55.0510] <Michael Ficarra>
* @nicolo-ribaudo:matrix.org were you planning on presenting the slides at plenary?

[09:24:23.0039] <nicolo-ribaudo>
I'll unfortunately not be there in person, so I can only present if it's not at the beginning of the meeting otherwise it's too early for me

[09:24:39.0537] <Michael Ficarra>
that's okay, I can present

[11:42:28.0895] <Richard Gibson>
request for at least one more review on https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/3958 ; it's needed for an ECMA-402 fix

[11:48:56.0467] <Richard Gibson>
it's a small and simple PR


2026-09-18
[09:49:37.0812] <nicolo-ribaudo>
I made a minor edit to the slide showing the improved linking of essential method, to show not only the definition table but also the actual methods being linked in algorithms

[13:16:11.0475] <Richard Gibson>
also on https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/3962 upgrading ESMeta