20:34
<sideshowbarker>
I am trying to figure out how to resolve https://github.com/mdn/content/issues/5509
20:36
<sideshowbarker>
given https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2125, would it be appropriate for me to remove the big red Deprecated warning from the MDN article at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Object/proto ?
20:45
<ptomato>
this is what was referred to as "icky" when we discussed it in plenary in September: https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2125#issuecomment-695881423
20:46
<sideshowbarker>
ptomato: OK, yeah, I read the parts about “icky” in that issue discussion
20:46
<ptomato>
the "Deprecated" warning says "may only be kept for compatibility purposes", that seems accurate to the situation?
20:46
<ptomato>
(just my opinion, not an official stance)
20:48
<sideshowbarker>
OK thanks — yeah if Object.prototype.__proto__ is considered icky, then it seems appropriate for MDN to keep the Deprecated warning
20:48
<sideshowbarker>
(it had just not been clear to me that Object.prototype.__proto__ was in fact in the icky classification
20:49
<ptomato>
oh, wait, I'm not sure of the difference between "proto syntax" and "proto accessor", let me check the notes for the plenary
20:49
<sideshowbarker>
OK
20:52
<ptomato>
here's the discussion. https://github.com/tc39/notes/blob/master/meetings/2020-09/sept-21.md#move-proto-out-of-annex-b
20:52
<ptomato>
I'm still not sure after reading it whether that MDN page describes the "icky" item or the "non-icky" item. someone else closer to the discussion should weigh in 😃
21:31
<bakkot>
The __proto__ accessor is still "icky". The syntax in object literals is not.
22:00
<sideshowbarker>
OK thanks — thee MDN article documents the accessor, so I’ll close the MDN issue out with comment that the warning will remain in the article
22:03
<sideshowbarker>
hmm, I wanted to cite the logs, but looking at https://view.matrix.org/room/%21wbACpffbfxANskIFZq:matrix.org/ now it seems there are no IDs/anchors in the logs…
22:09
<bakkot>
sideshowbarker: I am actively working on getting better logs going, so if you wait a day I should have something more linkable for you
22:09
<sideshowbarker>
ok, thanks, I‘ll wait