| 03:20 | <bakkot> | jmdyck: my attempt to fix PrepareForTailCall by just avoiding the problem entirely: https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2495 |
| 03:21 | <bakkot> | unfortunately I just missed the cutoff to add it to the agenda for the upcoming meeting, so it'll have to wait for October for consensus |
| 04:17 | <bakkot> | actually maybe people haven't done their reviews yet; I'll give it a shot |
| 17:35 | <ljharb> | (the cutoff only applies to proposals) |
| 17:40 | <littledan> | Lots of delegates like to have time to review everything which is for consensus ahead of time |
| 17:41 | <yulia> | good timing bakkot ;) we reviewed it |
| 17:41 | <yulia> | but yeah, if its big and complicated its nice to have it on friday |
| 17:42 | <yulia> | that said i also posted iterator helpers late (today) as an update so people know its actively worked on |
| 17:47 | <bakkot> | for sure, my concern is less "is it formally after the deadline" and more "is it early enough that people will get a chance to look at it" |
| 18:23 | <shu> | another reminder that we are way oversubscribed this meeting anyhow |
| 19:37 | <ptomato> | somehow I don't think I would've gotten away with dropping http://ptomato.name/talks/tc39-2021-08/ on the agenda next Monday, even though it's not a proposal, so I've been interpreting the deadline as an expected courtesy even if it's not formally required |