15:56 | <jasnell> | Hello all... hope you're all well. I'd like to see about getting a new proposal on the agenda (possibly march?) It's an alternative take on the existing base64 proposal that covers hex, base64, and base32 encoding -- https://github.com/jasnell/tc39-proposal-hex-base64 (the existing base64 proposal is here: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-arraybuffer-base64) |
16:10 | <bakkot> | jasnell: I think it probably makes more sense to open this as issues on https://github.com/tc39/proposal-arraybuffer-base64? It doesn't seem like it's a fundamentally different proposal, just differs on some details |
16:10 | <bakkot> | In particular, it is likely to run into the same concerns about support for streaming, as in https://github.com/tc39/proposal-arraybuffer-base64/issues/13, which is where the existing proposal is currently hung |
16:11 | <bakkot> | (Also I intended to also support hex; see https://github.com/tc39/proposal-arraybuffer-base64/issues/8. if you'd like to make a case for base32 as well, feel free to open an issue there, though see existing discussion in https://github.com/tc39/proposal-arraybuffer-base64/issues/7#issuecomment-872536851) |
16:13 | <Luca Casonato> | I should comment on that issue. Maybe we can move the TC39 proposal forward without streaming, and then Ill switch my WHATWG proposal into a WHATWG stream based streaming proposal. |
16:14 | <jasnell> | Will open an issue in that repo and move the discussion there :-) thanks all |
16:15 | <bakkot> | phoddie is mainly concerned about the embedded use case, so a solution involving whatwg streams is unlikely to work for him, but please feel free to suggest it |
16:15 | <bakkot> | (that also seems to me like a good option, if we can get buy-in) |
22:43 | <leobalter> |
|
23:05 | <jmdyck> | Well, ((0, f())++ is a Syntax Error because it has an extra left paren, but assuming that (0, f())++ was meant, I think they're both early Syntax Errors. |
23:07 | <jmdyck> | Though I think they would have both been early Reference Errors at one point. |
23:55 | <Ashley Claymore> | in Chrome 97 at least |