15:56
<jasnell>
Hello all... hope you're all well. I'd like to see about getting a new proposal on the agenda (possibly march?) It's an alternative take on the existing base64 proposal that covers hex, base64, and base32 encoding -- https://github.com/jasnell/tc39-proposal-hex-base64 (the existing base64 proposal is here: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-arraybuffer-base64)
16:10
<bakkot>
jasnell: I think it probably makes more sense to open this as issues on https://github.com/tc39/proposal-arraybuffer-base64? It doesn't seem like it's a fundamentally different proposal, just differs on some details
16:10
<bakkot>
In particular, it is likely to run into the same concerns about support for streaming, as in https://github.com/tc39/proposal-arraybuffer-base64/issues/13, which is where the existing proposal is currently hung
16:11
<bakkot>
(Also I intended to also support hex; see https://github.com/tc39/proposal-arraybuffer-base64/issues/8. if you'd like to make a case for base32 as well, feel free to open an issue there, though see existing discussion in https://github.com/tc39/proposal-arraybuffer-base64/issues/7#issuecomment-872536851)
16:13
<Luca Casonato>
I should comment on that issue. Maybe we can move the TC39 proposal forward without streaming, and then Ill switch my WHATWG proposal into a WHATWG stream based streaming proposal.
16:14
<jasnell>
Will open an issue in that repo and move the discussion there :-) thanks all
16:15
<bakkot>
phoddie is mainly concerned about the embedded use case, so a solution involving whatwg streams is unlikely to work for him, but please feel free to suggest it
16:15
<bakkot>
(that also seems to me like a good option, if we can get buy-in)
22:43
<leobalter>
(f())++ would be a ReferenceError, but ((0, f())++ is a SyntaxError
wat
23:05
<jmdyck>
Well, ((0, f())++ is a Syntax Error because it has an extra left paren, but assuming that (0, f())++ was meant, I think they're both early Syntax Errors.
23:07
<jmdyck>
Though I think they would have both been early Reference Errors at one point.
23:55
<Ashley Claymore>
in Chrome 97 at least