| 00:26 | <Kris Kowal> | I see toAsync and how it avoids a {,Async} method name doubling so please disregard forAwaitEach and just assume I mean the behavior of AsyncIterator.protoype.forEach, which I think should return a promise for the done value |
| 00:27 | <Kris Kowal> | Thanks @bakkot |
| 01:03 | <bakkot> | was this not already the case? |
| 01:04 | <bakkot> | https://github.com/tc39/proposal-iterator-helpers/issues/218 |