| 05:55 | <snek> | that seems pretty uncontentious, they should just bring it |
| 07:36 | <annevk> | Can someone explain to me how https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/1654 was determined to be a Stage 4 concern? It's a pretty significant security issue. |
| 07:36 | <annevk> | I really wish host integration was sorted out by Stage 3... |
| 12:28 | <littledan> | Host hooks vs implementation-defined is sort of an editorial thing, IMO |
| 12:28 | <littledan> | At least in cases like this |
| 12:39 | <annevk> | The normative text doesn't call it out and there might be an implementation that overlooked this as a result |
| 12:40 | <annevk> | I think especially when security is important we should have a clear understanding of the control flow |
| 12:48 | <littledan> | Ah I see, sorry I hadn’t read the issue before responding |
| 12:49 | <littledan> | There had been earlier discussions about host hooks in Temporal which I thought were editorial and I got confused. |