| 18:02 | <snek> | it should call it |
| 18:02 | <snek> | maybe you've hit a bug |
| 22:30 | <Hemanth H.M> | Is there a section in the spec which talks about spec specific symbols and their meaning? (Grammar??) For example: |
| 22:40 | <bakkot> | notational conventions |
| 22:41 | <bakkot> | ? is specifically covered under https://tc39.es/ecma262/multipage/notational-conventions.html#sec-returnifabrupt-shorthands |
| 22:41 | <bakkot> | though note that the spec does not have a notion of "an exception being thrown" in the spec's meta-language |
| 22:41 | <bakkot> | there's just completion records, some of which can be throw completions |
| 22:41 | <bakkot> | (same as in e.g. rust) |
| 23:10 | <jmdyck> | If by "grammar", you mean a grammar for the pseudocode in the spec's algorithms, then no, no such section. The closest is https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-algorithm-conventions |
| 23:38 | <Hemanth H.M> | Ah, right! Notational and Algorithmic conventions; Trying to translate that to dev approximations rather than spec's meta-language. |