00:01 | <bakkot> | Math.TWO_PI, I love it |
00:01 | <bakkot> | (TAU is better but less funny) |
00:02 | <shu> | i would be in favor of TWO_PI but would not be in favor of TAU for this reason |
00:04 | <bakkot> |
ok actually TWO_PI is maybe reasonable |
00:04 | <bakkot> | (from https://github.com/golang/go/issues/40663#issuecomment-671605986 ) |
00:04 | <shu> | 2 * Math.PI is less typing even |
00:05 | <bakkot> | only in contexts where you don't need parentheses |
04:10 | <BrownJenkin> | * sorry. you are right. this is a very important piece of software and change needs to have a very good reason. |
07:44 | <annevk> | Math.2PI , checkmate |
07:52 | <Domenic> | Math["2PI"] is required, which is even funnier. |
12:15 | <littledan> | Can we add Math.OFFSET (defined as 1) to add or subtract to fix off-by-one errors? This need occurs frequently in industry. |
12:16 | <littledan> | Although it is longer to type, it supplies more semantic information |
13:08 | <bakkot> | perl has a better way https://perldoc.perl.org/perlvar#$%5B |
15:15 | <ptomato> | OPTION BASE 1 |
18:13 | <Hemanth H.M> | Is there a way to know the contributions made by ecma members in TC39? Like number of proposals championed or authored? The current dataset doesn't provide that stat. |
18:15 | <Hemanth H.M> | Math.tau! |
18:17 | <Hemanth H.M> | looks like there was some discussion https://esdiscuss.org/topic/math-tau |
19:10 | <littledan> | Hemanth H.M: you can probably find this from the proposal repo. What are you trying to do? |
19:55 | <Hemanth H.M> | get a list of proposals that PayPal has participated since it joined ecma |
20:30 | <Michael Ficarra> | Hemanth H.M: somebody (I think yulia?) posted a link to a website made by a community member that allows you to break down proposals by person/stage/stars/etc |
20:30 | <Michael Ficarra> | I don't remember which Matrix channel it was in |
20:30 | <Michael Ficarra> | but if you look through the logs from around the last meeting, you should be able to find it |
20:44 | <Chris de Almeida> | https://www.proposals.es/ |
20:45 | <Chris de Almeida> | I believe that's this but it hasn't been updated in years |
20:56 | <yulia> | Hemanth H.M: somebody (I think yulia?) posted a link to a website made by a community member that allows you to break down proposals by person/stage/stars/etc |
20:57 | <yulia> | https://github.com/tc39/dataset |
20:58 | <yulia> | it is by name, not by member, but if you have a list of representatives it should be equivalent if you filter champions and authors |
21:17 | <ljharb> | how do you define participated? |
22:15 | <Michael Ficarra> | Chris de Almeida: ah yes, that was it |