14:22 | <shu> | does anyone know of npm packages / libraries that depend on the non-standard .stack ? |
14:31 | <Luca Casonato> | does anyone know of npm packages / libraries that depend on the non-standard |
14:33 | <Luca Casonato> | It also depends on v8 specific Error APIs |
14:33 | <nicolo-ribaudo> | Babel does some stack trace manipulation to show both plugin files and the code that originally called Babel |
14:35 | <Luca Casonato> | (It also uses prepareStackTrace) |
14:37 | <shu> | thanks luca and nicolo |
14:37 | <shu> | the context here is we're going to make it an accessor property instead of a data property because that's the right thing to do |
14:37 | <shu> | hopefully we don't break too anything but now i need to read these packages |
14:38 | <nicolo-ribaudo> | (we not only use .stack , but also do very bad things like relying on .prepareStackTrace ) |
14:38 | <nicolo-ribaudo> | the context here is we're going to make it an accessor property instead of a data property because that's the right thing to do |
14:38 | <Luca Casonato> | Some of our enterprise customers also make use of Error.stack in various ways |
14:39 | <nicolo-ribaudo> | It won't break Babel .stack , so if it's only a getter it might throw on assignment |
14:40 | <Luca Casonato> | I’ll check with our customers whether this will break them |
14:41 | <shu> | so, currently it's not a real data property. it appears as one but it has C++ getter and setter |
14:41 | <shu> | we want to change it to an accessor property, it'll have the same getter and setter |
14:41 | <shu> | assignment should still work |
14:41 | <shu> | what'll break is stuff like getOwnPropertyDescriptor and depending on its being a data property |
14:41 | <shu> | I’ll check with our customers whether this will break them |
14:42 | <littledan> | I like this change. I'll note that I previously changed some random Intl/Promise stuff into getters/setters when trying to deprecate them, and it didn't seem to break anything. But each case is random and different. |
14:42 | <shu> | yeah |
15:50 | <ljharb> | that's amazing, thank you - it will dramatically reduce the web reality that the stack proposal has to account for |
16:02 | <shu> | fingers crossed on no breakages |
16:16 | <Luca Casonato> | thanks! |
18:12 | <shu> | thank you for checking |