| 05:32 | <Aapo Alasuutari> | Functions are the salt of programming language, are they not? And salts come in many flavours. Hence, no bad can come from having more function syntaxes! Also preferably have them be subtly different in runtime behaviour. Maybe `^x` could inherit `this` from the caller again? |
| 07:07 | <annevk> | The http://ampl.com/REFS/abstracts.html#rounding reference in ECMA-262 is dead |
| 07:08 | <annevk> | (Noticed that after reading up on what it actually says about number -> string due to watching https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0WrRdW7eqg (well worth watching).) |
| 08:53 | <snek> | anyone know something like acorn-loose but for typescript and written in rust? |
| 15:51 | <nicolo-ribaudo> | CI in the ecma262 repo... builds node from source?? https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/actions/runs/10371824886/job/28713031096?pr=3057 |
| 16:05 | <snek> | ljharb ^^ that only happens if a binary release is missing right? |
| 16:06 | <snek> | oh i see |
| 16:06 | <snek> | the download failed |
| 16:06 | <snek> | curl: (92) HTTP/2 stream 0 was not closed cleanly: INTERNAL_ERROR (err 2) |
| 16:06 | <snek> | it should probably only build from source if the status is actually 404 😄 |
| 16:12 | <nicolo-ribaudo> | I'd rather have it retry for 30 mins before building from source |
| 16:25 | <bakkot> | incredible |
| 16:25 | <bakkot> | I am canceling this job |
| 16:27 | <bakkot> | I think I would want a special flag for "build from source" rather than that being the default |
| 18:22 | <Justin Ridgewell> | anyone know something like acorn-loose but for typescript and written in rust? |
| 20:20 | <Ashley Claymore> | Swc isn't error tolerant, at least I couldn't find a way to make it keep going |
| 20:36 | <ljharb> | I think I would want a special flag for "build from source" rather than that being the default |
| 21:33 | <canadahonk> | aware this is likely non-conformant to spec details but is Promise.try roughly similar to an async function IIFE? ala (cb, ...args) => (async function () { return cb(...args); })() |
| 21:56 | <ljharb> | very similar yes |
| 23:33 | <canadahonk> | notes PR CI failed because Node failed to install? (cc ljharb) https://github.com/tc39/notes/actions/runs/10377020557/job/28734457622?pr=336 |
| 23:34 | <ljharb> | ah i know what that is, i'll take care of it soon |
| 23:34 | <canadahonk> | cool, no rush, just wanted to make sure you knew |
| 23:36 | <Michael Ficarra> | our CI has been having... issues today |