05:26
<Michael Ficarra>
I have code which does arr[arr.length - 1] = foo somewhere on the order of billions of times per day, yes. though I don't think arr[^-1] or whatever would be notable faster
probably closer to hundreds of trillions in my estimate
18:04
<shu>
is that a lot
18:20
<bakkot>
well, it's enough to care about small amounts of performance
22:28
<annevk>
shu: thanks for closing old issues properly, it's appreciated