| 05:02 | <Sacha Greif> | follow up on this: what if we split this in two questions, one asking about Stage 3+2.7 features, and one asking about Stage 2 features, while limiting both lists to the top 10 items that are relevant to the broadest section of the JS community? |
| 05:03 | <Sacha Greif> | I know this is a subjective metric, but otherwise that's probably too many items to ask respondents to scan through |
| 05:04 | <Sacha Greif> | the idea behind splitting things between Stage 3/2.7 and 2 is that it offers an opportunity to educate people on what the stages mean as part of the question prompt |
| 05:07 | <Sacha Greif> | so, to recap, I see three ways to formulate the question:
|
| 16:18 | <Chris de Almeida> | Sacha Greif: we would ask that you not cover stage 0, 1, or 2 proposals at all. 2.7+ is fine |