10:34
<Sacha Greif>
yeah the time-space continuum has been a bit hectic ever since that giant baby exploded…
10:35
<Sacha Greif>
but also I decided to close the survey early to publish the results as soon as possible; I didn't want to get too close to the holidays
10:35
<Sacha Greif>
in fact a preview is available: https://state-of-js-2024.onrender.com/en-US/
17:03
<ljharb>
ah ok, that's too bad
17:05
<nicolo-ribaudo>
I'm very surprised that 10% of people in that survey are already using Temporal... A proposal not shipped anywhere yet 😅
17:10
<ljharb>
lol yeah that seems very very suspicious
17:10
<ljharb>
like if it's actually 10% of the survey respondents then i think that's strong evidence that the respondents aren't representative of the ecosystem :-/
18:14
<Ashley Claymore>
I use it in chats all the time to show how much better things will be when we have it 
18:26
<shu>
isn't there a polyfill
18:32
<Ashley Claymore>
and it is being used  https://www.npmjs.com/package/temporal-polyfill?activeTab=dependents 
18:32
<shu>
i'd suspect that's what the respondents meant then?
18:43
<littledan>
I share ljharb's suspicion of the results
18:43
<littledan>
they are still interesting!
18:45
<shu>
0% uses TLA 💀
18:45
<shu>
why did we build it dawg
18:54
<nicolo-ribaudo>
0% uses TLA 💀
I know that at least 3 of those 13 people are in this room — react to this message to see if all of the 13 that voted for it are here!
21:30
<Chris de Almeida>
I am not ashamed
22:09
<shu>
how do you feel being part of the 100th percentile
22:36
<Chris de Almeida>
statistically insignificant