| 05:36 | <snek> | @mitrax-of-dan:matrix.org: just fyi your proposal has not been rejected by the committee. there are many delegates and you spoke to only two of them here so far. and as your proposal was not championed and considered for advancement at a meeting yet it was not officially decided on one way or another. |
| 05:40 | <snek> | there's also been a lot of discussion about the TextEncoder api in the past, about where it belongs and whether it would be faster if it were implemented directly in js engines. might be good context to look into. |
| 06:03 | <Daniel Dyryl> | Phew. Just kind of emotional, my apologies. These are my first ever proposals, I am not used to the rules of “several rejections != stop promoting ideas”. |
| 06:25 | <kriskowal> | Reminds me that when I was in a brass quintet and we were off to our first conference, our directors made sure we understood that the adjudicators don’t waste feedback if they don’t think you have potential. The more the better. A dearth of criticism is not what it seems. |