| 04:37 | <ljharb> | possibly? i haven't seen an issue, but i heard something about it the other day |
| 13:29 | <dminor> | My understanding is that the proposal can't advance at TC39 without positive statements of interest on the DOM side (https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9893) and no implementers have expressed an interest. |
| 13:30 | <dminor> | I'd certainly be opposed to it advancing again without support for the DOM changes. |
| 13:32 | <annevk> | Yeah that makes sense. I'm wondering if we should clean up WPT as ShadowRealm currently adds a bunch of noise. Maybe I should just do it as it can easily be reverted once interest is expressed. |
| 13:32 | <dminor> | That makes sense to me, I've also encountered that while working on other JavaScript features that have WPT. |
| 14:08 | <mgaudet> | For similar noise related reasons we removed our prototype while things gel |
| 15:25 | <ptomato> | I think it's OK to revert the ShadowRealm harness changes in WPT for now. it's disappointing to have put so much work into it, but such is standardization in the big city 😄 |
| 15:26 | <ptomato> | I'll see if I can find time to make the repo reflect the current status |
| 16:39 | <annevk> | FYI: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/59794 |