| 10:20 | <Zb Tenerowicz (ZTZ/naugtur)> | I wanted to help push pick/omit proposal forward and saw it got pushback on the use of dynamic function. Would this have a better chance? https://gist.github.com/naugtur/6eb60da7737eebd7536cf53f1afe7621 |
| 14:36 | <Richard Gibson> | ergonomically, I don't hate it |
| 17:08 | <Ashley Claymore> | https://github.com/tc39/proposal-discard-binding would achieve the syntatic omit |
| 21:34 | <ljharb> | yeah tbh both together do seem like a good fit |
| 21:34 | <ljharb> | * aww, I’ll be out of towt |
| 21:34 | <ljharb> | * aww, I’ll be out of town |
| 21:50 | <Zb Tenerowicz (ZTZ/naugtur)> | So instead of :undefined we'd do :void when we don't need the listed fields. I could skip dynamic fields with variants of [] syntax and get a stage for the basic one |
| 23:23 | <Ashley Claymore> | There is also https://github.com/zkat/proposal-as-patterns |