2026-09-01
[03:20:51.0184] <Zb Tenerowicz (ZTZ/naugtur)>
I wanted to help push pick/omit proposal forward and saw it got pushback on the use of dynamic function. 
Would this have a better chance? https://gist.github.com/naugtur/6eb60da7737eebd7536cf53f1afe7621 

[07:36:41.0123] <Richard Gibson>
ergonomically, I don't hate it

[10:08:53.0254] <Ashley Claymore>
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-discard-binding would achieve the syntatic omit 

[14:34:32.0395] <ljharb>
yeah tbh both together do seem like a good fid

[14:34:33.0500] <ljharb>
* aww, I’ll be out of towt

[14:34:37.0655] <ljharb>
* yeah tbh both together do seem like a good fit

[14:34:48.0645] <ljharb>
* aww, I’ll be out of town

[14:50:44.0532] <Zb Tenerowicz (ZTZ/naugtur)>
So instead of :undefined we'd do :void when we don't need the listed fields.

I could skip dynamic fields with variants of [] syntax and get a stage for the basic one

[16:23:29.0327] <Ashley Claymore>
There is also https://github.com/zkat/proposal-as-patterns