2026-10-20 [01:07:40.0121] Is this the main place chat room for TC39? [02:31:02.0794] > <@daraknet:matrix.org> Is this the main place chat room for TC39? yep this is it 2026-10-23 [03:32:02.0459] Can we pin ecma426 in the tc39 GH org profile? :) [07:29:40.0128] we could... but that would also mean deciding which repo to unpin [09:41:19.0431] I nominate the `notes` one [09:41:33.0646] Between that and agendas, I feel like more people read the agenda than the notes [10:28:26.0225] honestly, I would replace test262 [10:28:47.0825] only delegates and implementers use test262, and they know where to look for that [10:29:20.0252] the general public benefits from the proposals, notes, and agendas links [13:36:56.0012] We could link to the notes from the finished agendas once they are published, so still easily discoverable. [13:38:06.0743] with a placeholder on latest agenda without notes saying: "link to notes will be added once published" so people know to return [13:51:08.0210] people _may_ be forgetting the README content that appears above the pinned repos, which include already links to everything (including the source map spec) [13:51:39.0375] improvements to the readme are also fair game 2026-10-24 [20:18:24.0413] well 426 and 404 are already linked from there, so I imagine @nicolo-ribaudo:matrix.org was looking for something more [20:38:38.0779] just curious - who's the audience we're expecting will be excited to read the source map spec, and will need to find it from github.com/tc39, and also won't see the existing link? [03:51:20.0393] Yeah the reason is not that somebody was looking for the link and couldn't find it. I just noticed that two of the specs we actively work on are pinned and the third one is not 2026-10-25 [06:54:47.0059] C++26 failed to be ratified: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/robertseacord_balloting-has-completed-for-c26-unfortunately-share-7519795139859517440-AOth/ [06:59:51.0102] like with ECMAScript, all their previous standards were unanimous