| 07:45 | <annevk> | yulia: will Fx hold off from shipping Import Assertions? |
| 09:16 | <yulia> | annevk: we can wait on it, yes |
| 18:21 | <annevk> | Although I'll be on vacation the week of the next TC39 meeting (assuming https://github.com/tc39/agendas/blob/main/2023/01.md is correct), I'm willing to make the time to attend a morning session about this topic if that would help. |
| 18:22 | <Kris Kowal> | Are there champions among us who intend to present at plenary? |
| 18:22 | <Kris Kowal> | I for one expect to not be able to attend, depending on how the baby-wave-function collapses, so I’m not making any such plans. |
| 18:24 | <littledan> | We're working on a presentation in Bloomberg+Igalia for next meeting, and will have something on the agenda today |
| 18:24 | <littledan> | I'm a champion of the initial proposal and will put my stamp on it but might not actually be the presenter. I'm totally open to being a co-presenter if needed though. |
| 18:24 | <littledan> | Although I'll be on vacation the week of the next TC39 meeting (assuming https://github.com/tc39/agendas/blob/main/2023/01.md is correct), I'm willing to make the time to attend a morning session about this topic if that would help. |
| 18:25 | <Kris Kowal> | A presentation regarding import assertions? |
| 18:26 | <nicolo-ribaudo> | Yes, based on the discussion we had on Tuesday |
| 18:28 | <nicolo-ribaudo> | Although I'll be on vacation the week of the next TC39 meeting (assuming https://github.com/tc39/agendas/blob/main/2023/01.md is correct), I'm willing to make the time to attend a morning session about this topic if that would help. |
| 18:29 | <annevk> | Yeah, that would be great, thanks! |