| 13:42 | <Luca Casonato> | Hey folks, if we have time I'd like to present something on module instance imports. I wrote up an explainer here: https://github.com/lucacasonato/proposal-module-instance-imports I'd like to talk about it at the TC39 tools meeting tomorrow to get some feedback from tool authors on this direction before talking to HTML folks (and then I'll try present at Tokyo plenary) |
| 16:05 | <nicolo-ribaudo> | I'll join, I just have to figure out why in google meet my audio is not working |
| 18:03 | <Kris Kowal> | Am I right that we’re in agreement that “module phase imports” means that the module has advanced to at least the “linked” phase before you get a handle on the instance? |
| 18:04 | <Kris Kowal> | That seems consistent with all visions of the future except the one where a module instance could be transferred without linkage, relieving the sender of the obligation to load a possibly different module graph before transmitting the instance. |
| 18:05 | <Kris Kowal> | Whereas, source phase does not imply the sender doing any of that work. |
| 18:06 | <Kris Kowal> | I like that import.source and import.module can facilitate different scenarios. |
| 23:13 | <Kris Kowal> | Luca Casonato: My proposal this morning does not account for transfer of import.meta. |
| 23:13 | <Kris Kowal> | And I suspect it cannot. |