| 21:36 | <shu> | i've been chatting some more with internal partners here, and i think we do need to make arrays (i.e. the ability to express a list of things instead of individual fields) in scope |
| 21:36 | <shu> | without arrays, this may be too hard to use |
| 21:37 | <shu> | probably needs to be fixed length instead of arbitrarily resizable |
| 21:37 | <shu> | thoughts? |
| 22:07 | <rbuckton> | Something like a TypedArray for a struct type instead of a number type, or do you mean something else? |
| 22:14 | <shu> | not sure how that would look exactly, i just meant some way to share arrays as part of structs |
| 22:14 | <shu> | either arrays of other structs or arrays of primitives |
| 22:15 | <shu> | oh, sorry, i meant for the shared structs part |
| 22:20 | <rbuckton> | I agree that arrays are essential for shared structs. Without them you are left with building linked lists for anything collection like |
| 22:27 | <shu> | yeah |