2023-02-06 [10:25:42.0253] do we have a mechanism for disabling tests as suggested in https://github.com/tc39/test262/issues/3780 ? I don't think we've disabled tests for other proposals such as cleanupSome that were demoted to stage 2 or split off another proposal at stage 2 [10:26:26.0333] i'm not aware of a mechanism to keep the tests in-tree but disabled [10:26:43.0194] good call on cleanupSome i don't even remember what we did then [12:22:04.0088] i'd think we'd just remove them? it's easy to revert the removal later [12:22:16.0191] are there tests for async iterator helpers? [12:25:52.0927] they may be part of the outdated PR for iterator helpers, but none are merged into main [13:04:05.0540] also the implementation is going to become radically different so I do not recommend writing tests yet 2023-02-15 [07:06:21.0632] i don't think i can make today's meeting [08:08:14.0344] ah, no worries. Richard Gibson Rick Waldron how about you? [08:08:52.0876] thanks for the ping, joining now [10:33:41.0004] ljharb: one question that came up in the meeting, is arraybuffer transfer fully covered now that the PRs from you and Shu have been landed? [10:35:41.0379] my PR was .detached, i'm not sure if transfer and transferToFixedLength are both covered [10:35:47.0354] but if so, then yes i'd say it's covered [10:36:12.0963] I haven't seen anything go by for transferToFixedLength [10:36:15.0675] thanks [10:41:38.0596] the existing transfer tests, and https://github.com/es-shims/ArrayBuffer.prototype.transferToFixedLength/blob/main/test/tests.js, can be used as inspiration for anyone who wants to work on it [11:03:30.0897] yeah i think the only thing missing is transferToFixedLength [11:03:56.0222] the existing transfer tests can probably just be copied and the `.resizable` / `.growable` checks tweaked 2023-02-16 [14:39:11.0700] can I get a maintainer stamp on https://github.com/tc39/test262/pull/3784 ?